This is Metropolitan OPEN land

IMG_2303

Area of former golf course enclosed for very small paddock area

IMG_2301

The ponytrekking around the former golf course costs from £20 per hour, per person

IMG_2306

The campsite, where vehicles are allowed to drive on to the land, and the old tees have been left to corrode

IMG_2307

Portaloos and showers, presumably costing £100s per week to hire. A pitch is just £25 a night.

IMG_2308

Pre-pitched tents, one in occupation when photographed.

IMG_2309

Grass clippings dumped on wildlife areas.

IMG_2305

Mounds of grass clippings left in the campsite during a heatwave.

002

Campers use site as rubbish dump

003

Two campers fail to make it back safely after the night and sleep on the verge by the car park

001

Mound of dead grass used to dispose of beer cans by campers

IMG_2304

Posted in Leyton Marshes | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

Let’s ‘Give Nature a Home’ on Our Marshes

Recently the RSPB and other wildlife organisations teamed up to investigate how under threat our birds, wildlife and ecosystems are in the UK today.

Bees and dragonflies at the former Waterworks golf course

Bees and dragonflies at the former Waterworks golf course

The shocking results were published in a seminal State of Nature report which reveals that in the last 50 years, a staggering 60% of monitored species have declined; one in ten are threatened with extinction and 44 million birds have been lost.

In consequence of the report, the RSPB launched a campaign appropriately titled ‘Giving Nature a Home’. The impetus behind the campaign is that the alarming loss of wildlife is because nature’s homes are disappearing or being destroyed.

Unfortunately, this is something all to familiar to those of us living in London and who are witnessing, day after day, the destruction and inappropriate management of our green spaces. In recent years, 17% of our green spaces in the city have been paved over. Huge swathes of green space, including the Eastway Cycle Track and Bully Fen Nature Reserve were swallowed underneath the Olympic construction machine; now these areas are only home to concrete and empty venues. Other areas, such as East Marsh and Leyton Marsh, which were earmarked for ‘temporary’ use for the Olympics, have not been returned in the condition promised to us by the authorities involved.

Leyton Marsh - after botched reinstatement and mowing

Leyton Marsh – after botched reinstatement and mowing

Leyton Marsh, formerly the home to many species of wildflowers and promised back to the public in ‘its original condition’ is now a dying wasteland. From the images, you can see the recent round of mowing has revealed vast areas where the grass has died and nothing is growing at all. The latest round of mowing cut the grass down to the lowest possible level and destroyed one of the four sections of the Special Area for Nature Conservation, one of the remaining areas on Leyton Marsh not affected by construction of the Olympic venue.

Many nature organisations are focused upon assisting people to make homes for wildlife in their gardens, a highly laudable aim which should be supported in its own right. However, what is often forgotten is the hectares of land with thriving wildlife which small grassroots organisations like ourselves are struggling to protect. Our marshes could easily be safeguarded as a home for our struggling native species of wildlife. No massive program of planting or sowing is required, just a few simple changes by the authorities in whose jurisdiction the land lies.

The Lee Valley Regional Park Authority (LVRPA) manages a huge area of land along the Lea Valley, including Leyton, Walthamstow and Tottenham Marshes.

Over the course of our campaign, we have witnessed firsthand how an organisation ostensibly set up in order to safeguard this land, with subsidies from London councils in order to do so, is actually undertaking development and management practices in direct contravention to the measures so desperately needed to protect our remaining wild spaces. At a full authority meeting back in February, SLM members were dumbfounded when it was declared that ‘contaminated areas’ would be left for wildlife. This was the only reference to wildlife during the full authority and executive meetings that day; these meetings went on from 10am to 4.30pm.

One of the ways the LVRPA could safeguard precious habitats for our wildlife is through improved management that takes into account both the State of Nature report and latest research on management practices. From the images, you can see some of the effects of undertaking mowing during early summer. Other equally detrimental effects to our wildlife remain hidden but are all too real. Species such as grasshoppers, necessary for supporting the rich habitat found on the marshes, perish when the mowing is carried out. Ants nests are cut in two and do not survive the assault of blades of heavy machinery driving through their homes – the remnants of dozens could be seen in 2013 after the June mowing .

Areas which once supported so much life are left barren and many species become unnecessarily homeless. This is entirely preventable. The government have been advised to ban grass cutting during early summer in order to protect bees and other pollinators in critical decline. As a park authority, the LVRPA should be a leading light in adopting these sort of measures, rather than justifying a maintenance regime unsupported by evidence.

One tiny area of meadow escaped the mowers this June -  but it was cut down a couple of days later

One tiny area of meadow almost escaped the mowers this June – but it was cut down a couple of days later

Yellow Meadow Ant nest destroyed by LVRPA june mowing, Walthamstow Marsh SSSI

Foreground – Yellow Meadow Ant nest destroyed by LVRPA June mowing, Walthamstow Marsh SSSI

 

Walthamstow Marsh shortly after June mowing - Knapweed had just begun flowering

Walthamstow Marsh shortly after June mowing – Knapweed had just begun flowering

 

The LVRPA could also maximise areas that support wildlife by refraining from hacking back wildflowers and undergrowth adjacent to paths and mowing either side of Sandy Lane so deep that it would require two trucks passing each other before anyone was forced to brush against a flower (also see image below of savage cutting adjacent to the Boardwalk on Walthamstow Marshes).

Hacked down undergrowth adjacent to pathway

Hacked down undergrowth adjacent to pathway

Whilst wildlife is threatened by the introduction of harmful invasive species by man, the solution is not the application of Monsanto-made products which are highly toxic to plant, amphibian and insect life. Unfortunately, the LVRPA has written to us recently outlining that it plans to maintain the use of glyphosate (Monsanto-made RoundUp) to control Giant Hogweed, New Zealand Pigmyweed and Japanese Knotweed. In the areas where this weedkiller has been applied to the Pigmyweed, the water in the ditches, which usually support a range of amphibian life including newts and tadpoles is milky and lifeless. An alternative would be the use of volunteers to pull up the weed by hand in winter, allowing any insects to crawl out and clearing it from the ditches without harming other species.

The areas where Giant Hogweed once stood tall around the former golf course are now yellow and brown which means that rather than being spot-treated, the areas affected have been sprayed, killing not just the Giant Hogweed but all life around the plants. Eventually the plant will become resistant to the weedkiller and larger and larger doses of this toxin will be required. We have suggested, after obtaining advice from the Pesticides Action Network, that both stem injection systems and the latest non-toxic WeedTech technology could be used instead.

And if this all sounds a little depressing, then keep reading, because  you can help stop these destructive practices and help give nature a permanent home!

Unmown area of Walthamstow Marshes - bursting with life!

Unmown area of Walthamstow Marshes – bursting with life!

Walking through the marshes, there are still areas of vast natural beauty. These unmown areas of Walthamstow Marshes are a rich array of rusty red, white, yellow and purple wildflowers simply buzzing with life, despite the terrible winter for bees. These areas can be protected with enough interest and action from an educated public i.e. you!

Please write to the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority: info@leevalleypark.org.uk and CC their biodiversity officer Cath Patrick: cpatrick@leevalleypark.org.uk asking that they undertake the following measures:

1) That, in line with the latest research, mowing is not undertaken in early summer at all due to its detrimental effect on all species, but in particular our pollinators. Preferably, grazing can be used to substitute for mowing; grazing is a non-harmful method to support the biodiversity of plantlife which does not kill insects, ants, bees and other species nor make our wildlife homeless. For more information on the ‘No Mow’ campaign, check out the work of River of Flowers and Project Maya

2) Other means of controlling invasive species, that do not involve spraying or administering poisons such as Monsanto- made RoundUp, are found for the Site of Special Scientific Interest and elsewhere on the marshes. For more on the detrimental effects of pesticides on our wildlife and wildlife-friendly alternatives, check out PAN_UK

3) That the Higher Level Stewardship Scheme that the LVRPA has entered into with Natural England is adapted to take into account not just controlling plant species non-native to the UK, but to safeguarding all wildlife on the marshes, in line with the latest reports and advice on mowing and maintenance for healthy ecosystems.

Let’s give nature a home on our marshes!

Close-up of unmown area on Walthamstow Marshes

Close-up of unmown area on Walthamstow Marshes

Posted in Lea Marshes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Please Have Your Say on Hackney Marshes ‘Improvements’

SLM STATEMENT 02 o7 13

The Hackney Council ‘Hackney Marshes Improvement Survey’ is online. It closes on 9th July so please fill it in as soon as you can.

When filling in the survey, please do not say you travel to the marshes by car as this will be used to justify the construction of car parks on our marsh.

For Q5, please state that you would like the pavilion to be built on the footprint of the present building.

Additionally, for Q7 please ask for guarantees that:

a) the green roof is established and maintained on the proposed building (which has not happened as promised at the Hackney Marshes User Centre) through binding agreements on maintenance that last for several years, not just 1 or 2 yrs.

b) that the precious black poplars adjacent to the building are protected throughout the construction process.

c) that biodiversity is protected and the construction companies involved are made liable for any damage to the environment.

It is important that we make our voices heard, as we successfully did over the events proposed for our marshes, in order to protect our remaining green space.

Posted in Hackney Marshes | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Please Have Your Say on Hackney Marshes ‘Improvements’

Waltham Forest Council Vote to Let LVRPA Destroy More Marshes In Commercial Ventures

Just last week an article in The Daily Mail covered the story of how one small business in Walthamstow was taken to court for giving away a cardboard box, at the cost of £15,000 to local taxpayers. Electrosigns in Walthamstow was brought to court under environmental protection laws after one cardboard box given to a customer eventually ended up on a fly-tipping site.

Whilst the judge called for common sense and threw out the case, deeming Waltham Forest Council’s actions a ‘monumental waste of public money’, Cllr Clyde Loakes said the eventual acquittal was a ‘disappointing result’ citing the Council’s drive to ‘wipe out environmental crime’ in the borough.

Compare this action by the Council to their recent record in protecting an extremely valuable environment within their jurisdiction, one uniquely precious for wildlife, which has protected status and is part of London’s ever shrinking green lung – Walthamstow and Leyton Marshes.

Leyton Marsh - left in a mess!

Leyton Marsh – left in a mess!

Last night, Waltham Forest Council’s planning committee voted through the LVRPA’s current development plans for our marshes. These plans will entail turning yet more of our marshes into a construction site, fencing local people out and churning out human and animal waste in places increasingly important for our dwindling wildlife populations. The plans come just over a year since the Council gave permission for the hugely destructive ‘temporary’ basketball court on Leyton Marsh which entailed the excavation of hazardous waste, including asbestos and ended with a botched ‘reinstatement’ whereby concrete and plastic were laid underneath a monoculture turf, where once there was an abundance of wildflowers. That turf is now brown and dying, in places completely dry and dead.

The former golf course at Leyton Marshes

The former golf course at Leyton Marshes

The plans to turn the former golf course, which it was promised would be returned to use after the Olympics, into a campsite and trailer park for tents, caravans and motorhomes was passed narrowly, by one vote, just like the basketball training court application. Three councillors voted for and three voted against giving approval to the campsite/ trailer park plans, whilst Cllr. Karen Bellamy abstained. The decision was therefore made by the chair, Peter Barnett who is completely hostile to our campaign and hasn’t let politenness prevent him from telling members of SLM to shut up on more than one occasion at planning committee meetings, including last night; this time when one of our members attempted to correct Cllr Jenny Gray, who, despite stating she had never been to the site in question, claimed walkers were unable to walk through the golf course anyway.

The Labour councillors and the chair did not appreciate the fact that Metropolitan Open Land has protected status by very virtue of its openness. Barnett claimed that Metropolitan Open Land was not about access and openness but instead about ‘leisure’. The construction of toilet and shower blocks on this presently open green land was deemed acceptable by the majority of the Labour councillors.

Regarding the extension of the stables on Leyton Marshes for commercial livery purposes (a plan known by campaigners as ‘the horse hotel’), only Cllr Alan Siggers voted against the plans whilst all the other six councillors voted for.

The Chair opened the discussion, strongly supporting the application. Cllr Siggers recalled that there were nine previous planning applications that permitted the development and creeping enlargement of the built facilities at site. The Chair exhibited extraordinary deference to the applicants, the LVRPA, who were permitted an additional speaker and questions from the committee; not privileges our speakers were privy to.

Unfortunately in a manner reminiscent of last year’s cheap PR citing the fact disabled people would play at the criminally under-used basketball training facility, the LVRPA cynically presented their plans as to the benefit of disabled riders. This is despite the fact the plans have nothing to do with the riding facilities on offer and are simply an attempt to make money from owners wishing to stable additional horses at an already overcrowded site, where horses have less than the recommended access to outside space – less than 0.07ha per horse.

IMG_2192Why, when the giving away of a cardboard box is meant to constitute an environmental crime, do the same council enable devastation of hectares of open land and the loss of precious natural habitat?

Posted in Lea Marshes, Leyton Marshes | 1 Comment

Waltham Forest Council Officers Recommend Approval for LVRPA’s Campsite & Stables Plans

Local people enjoying Leyton Marshes on the former golf course, which the LVRPA plans to turn into a 'trailer park'

Local people enjoying Leyton Marshes on the former golf course, which the LVRPA plans to turn into a ‘trailer park’

The Lee Valley Regional Park Authority have submitted two planning applications to the borough of Waltham Forest which are to be decided on at Tuesday evening’s WF Planning Committee meeting. This really is a last ditch attempt to save Leyton Marsh, and it would be fantastic to have a really large demonstration on the Town Hall steps and a lot of support in the Council Chamber for this meeting. Abigail Woodman of Save Lea Marshes will be speaking against the proposals, as will Katy Andrews and John Gilbert of the Lammas Lands Defence Committee and NE London CPRE is also planning to speak.
The Borough’s Officers are recommending that both of these applications should be approved.
The proposals are in fact completely against the borough’s own Local Development Framework and BAP and against the London Plan.
The first of the applications is to build a huge livery stable at the Riding Centre. This means stabling where privately-owned horses can be kept and cared for by the Riding Centre staff on payment of a very high fee. This is of absolutely no benefit to local residents, yet it is taking place on our Lammas Lands by an organisation which is supposed to be providing recreational facilities for Londoners whilst protecting the openness and biodiversity of the Lea Valley – London’s “Green Lung.” So much land at the Riding Centre has already been covered in the stables (there are now 90 horses in an area where originally 24 ponies were given planning permission) that it is already built up beyond the limits of acceptability for Metropolitan Open Land.
The other is to fence the public out from the entire Golf Course south of Lea Bridge Road, which the LVRPA hid from public view about 15 years ago by building a visitors’ centre and massive car-park between the golf course and Lea Bridge Road. Before that the area was open and could be seen to be open.
This the LVRPA want to use as a private trailer park and camp-site including for motor-homes. The use would be permanent, not time-limited, and open all year round. So local people would be fenced out of our Lammas Lands all day every day, and there would be loss of yet more precious open space with immense biodiversity potential.
Although Planning Committee members will not be told this, the LVRPA’s eventual aim is to cover this area with “pixie-hut” holiday chalets; if this change of use is accepted on Tuesday, then it would cover that as well as a more innocuous-sounding “camping” use.
As with the first application, there is absolutely no benefit to local people for this. We would lose access to our local Lammas Rights (commuted in 1905 from the right to graze cattle to the right of “free access in perpetuity for the purposes of relaxation and recreation” and sadly “suspended” by the Compulsory Purchase Order of the land by the LVRPA in 1971).
As part of the second application, the LVRPA also want to put in a paddock above the flood relief channel where it flows underground into the River Lea, for ponies to be used for pony trekking. There would not be any shelter there for the ponies, and the LVRPA say that they will be led across Lea Bridge Road twice per day to get there and back. There are a number of significant animal welfare issues about this.
If these applications go through next Tuesday, Leyton Marshes will effectively have ceased to exist as a contiguous whole and as an open space.
If passed, there is no possibility of an Appeal, but the way would be open to a) a formal Complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman; and/or b) Judicial Review (although JR can only be used against the process that was used, and in this case the grounds would have to be that officers gave insufficient consideration to higher legislation) and/or application for an injunction against any work starting to build more stables or to fence off the Golf Course. If passed, we would expect both to begin immediately, especially as the LVRPA have been taking bookings for the as yet non-existent camp-site over their website since early May.
Please join us on the steps of Waltham Forest Town Hall, from 6.30pm on Tuesday 2nd July to protest against yet more destructive plans for Leyton Marshes.
The planning committee meeting begins at 7pm.
Posted in Lea Marshes, Leyton Marshes | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

More building on Hackney Marsh

Hackney Council wants to build an enormous new pavilion on top of some of the playing fields on Hackney Marsh.  Here is the plan, showing where the building will be located, near to Cow Bridge and the Middlesex Filter Beds.

Image

To get a clearer idea of just how huge this monstrosity is going to be, some members of Save Lea Marshes measured it out using a few bamboo sticks and hundreds of metres of string.  This is the result.

Image

Why, you might ask, does the Council want to put up a new building on top of playing fields, instead of rebuilding the old dilapidated pavilion that is just next door?  That’s because they want to replace the old pavilion with a spanking new car park!  Clearly the last thing they want is to encourage walking and cycling on the Marshes…

If you would like to check our measurements, you are very welcome to do so.  Here they are.  The scale is 1cm : 10m.  Click on the plan to magnify it.

Pavilion3

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Council ignores planning permission in rush to build Marsh Lane bridge folly

Waltham Forest Council has rushed to begin work in breach of planning conditions on the highly controversial new bridge at Marsh Lane Fields – on which they plan to squander more than £250K on a cosmetic replacement for the existing, nearly new foot and vehicle bridges during a time of savage austerity cuts in one of London’s poorest boroughs.

The vehicle bridge is now fenced off and the road has been dug up on both sides. The Council have ignored the pre-commencement planning condition, required by the Environment Agency, that is intended to ensure the bridge does not cause increased flood risk to the neighbourhood.

IMG-20130614-00056

Work begins on the bridge – without permission

 Before construction began, approval should have been sought and granted for a flood storage compensation proposal, due to the impact of the bulkier, higher new bridge on flood risk from the Dagenham Brook which the bridge crosses.  But the Waltham Forest Council Planning Officer had heard nothing about such a scheme when contacted. She informed us that when got it she would be consulting the EA.

This is reckless behaviour by the Waltham Forest Council officers responsible for the bridge project, since until the flood compensation measures are designed and agreed it will not be certain that they are practically or economically achievable or that the impacts on the environment will be acceptable. It seems they will involve substantial excavations and landscaping of potentially contaminated land in the vicinity of the bridge, greatly increasing the scope and complexity of the project.

This planning officer also said that the Council do not consult the public about discharge of planning conditions so couldn’t promise to let us know when the proposals do materialise, and the public’s comments don’t have to be considered. It was pointed out that the planning condition required the flood compensation plans to be submitted and approved before the development commenced. She agreed this meant work shouldn’t have started, didn’t know it had started and would go down and have a look!

It’s a familiar story of facts on the ground materialising before adequate answers about the purpose and design of the works are shared with the public. At Wednesday evening’s Lea Bridge Ward (WF) Community Forum Cllrs Afzal Akram and Masood Ahmad could not answer the direct question about the purpose of the construction of a new bridge, nor could they account for the amount it is costing local Council taxpayers (£250k).

They deflected the questions from residents to their own Council Officer who was floundering to make a clear response, other than the spurious claim that a new bridge would ‘attract more people’ to the newly-named park.

Residents expressed great concern that the work programme for this contract has not yet been made available publicly, and that it is proving to be chaotic and poorly planned. They were alarmed at the Council Officer’s report that the precise location of a large gas main in the area of the proposed new bridge remains unidentified, in spite of excavations having been made to the furthest depths possible without requiring special conditions.

This means, amongst other things, that the size of the new bridge abutments (which will be embedded in the quite deep banks of the Dagenham Brook – currently providing habitat for wildlife) have not yet been finalised.

The Chair of the meeting Cllr Afzal Akram stated that he was going to seek further information about potential or suspected delays to this contract, which seems to proceeding on an ad-hoc and improvised basis with poor communication between the Council and contractors and between Council and public.

Though work began on the bridge on Friday, lack of signage means the public will not be aware that the pedestrian/ cycle bridge currently still remains open or when it is likely to be closed or what the alternative routes will be. There is confusion over whether the vehicle bridge will be permanantly or intermittently closed or how long the works will take.

marsh lane bridge closed signsSigns of chaos at the Marsh Lane bridge

It has now emerged that vehicles needing access to Marsh Lane ( residents, allotment  tenants and service vehicles) are being given keys to the Seymour School car park and will involve them driving down a footpath through one of the busiest parts of the park and next to the children’s play area. There is no warning signage or any attempt to address the safety implications or potential conflict between vehicles and park users.

Posted in Marsh Lane Fields | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Council ignores planning permission in rush to build Marsh Lane bridge folly

SLM Call on LVRPA to Establish London’s First Organic Golf Course at the Waterworks

Bees and dragonflies at the former Waterworks golf course

Bees and dragonflies at the former Waterworks golf course

SLM are calling upon the Lea Valley Regional Park Authority to turn Waterworks site (adjacent to Hackney Marshes in Leyton) into organic golf course, rather than the private campsite they have planned. The alternative wildlife-friendly plan is supported by a range of organisations set up to help bees in decline including River of Flowers, PAN-UK and Project Maya.

Read more here

Posted in Hackney Marshes, Lea Marshes, Leyton Marshes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on SLM Call on LVRPA to Establish London’s First Organic Golf Course at the Waterworks

A Litany of Broken Promises: Calling the LVRPA to Account

Yesterday, Thursday 13th June, SLM members arrived unannounced at the Lower Lee Valley LVRPA meeting at the Waterworks in order to express our sincere disappointment with the Authority.

At the only official meeting we have ever been offered with the LVRPA, which took place back in February, this organisation (which receives considerable public funds) made a series of promises to the group relating to working with marsh users, taking action on the poor state of Leyton Marsh and carrying out proper consultation in advance of any future plans.

The LVRPA have broken all these promises.

SLM read out a short statement outlining how our group and the public had been let down in the lower Lee Valley and delivered the following document to all present:

BROKEN PROMISES
At the meeting on 7 February, to which Save Lea Marshes was invited by Shaun
Dawson in order to improve the communication between the LVRPA and users of
Leyton and Walthamstow Marshes, a number of promises were made. None of
them have been kept. The meeting was not, as presented to us, a chance to change
the way the LVRPA engages with us, but an attempt to pacify us while the LVRPA
continued to hatch plans to develop our part of Metropolitan Open Land for
commercial gain (campsite, livery stables) in order to enrich itself at the expense of
local people. This is in direct contravention.to the purpose of the LVRPA.

THE PROMISES

LEYTON MARSH:
Waterlogging: Brian Daley stated that the ODA would carry out remedial work by
the end of the month (February). This did not happen. We told you the remedial
action proposed by the ODA wouldn’t work long term anyway as there is the
equivalent of concrete fill underneath the membrane.

Wildflower inspection: scheduled for end of March, and at some point before
June. Have these happened? If so, where are the results of the inspections?
Seeding plan: Brian Daley was tasked to get the document showing exactly what
seeds were planted and where from the ODA, and then pass this on to us. Not
received.
Full snagging list: this was promised for some time, by Martin Page at User
Forum meetings and then again at the meeting on the 7th. Not received..

ICE CENTRE
Feasibility study was to be completed by the end of March and results made known
to us. Shaun Dawson stated that the results would be public. We have heard
nothing.

IMPROVEMENT IN CONSULTATION AND USER ENGAGEMENT
SLM to be invited to all investigations on Leyon Marsh AND SLM to be
involved in finding solutions to the problems.

Core Samples: We were invited at very short notice to attend at 2:00, In fact, the
contractor started at 8:00. By the time we arrived, the contractor’s drill had broken
when he got to the part of the site where the concrete fill was. The contractor was
told to come back and finish taking the samples with a new drill bit, but we were not
invited back when this happened, if it did happen and we have never received the
results of the sample taking. There has been no further correspondence from Brian
Daley about this at all.

The contractor confirmed to Brian Daley what we said at the meeting — that the ODA
plan of drilling drainage holes would not solve the drainage problem because of the
concrete fill. Although we have amongst us an abundance of knowledge, whatever
we say is ignored. BD refused to accept that the fill is equivalent to concrete, despite
evidence from the contractor and the fact that we observed the whole excavation
and building process during which he wasn’t even here..

Wildflower investigations: We have been given no information on this – although it is
clear to see that there are no wildflowers (aside from some white clover of unknown
provenance) and the only grass is monoculture fodder grass on the site of the
basketball courts. There has been no spread of the grasses and wildflowers from
the untouched part of the field to the “reinstated” area –.as if there is an invisible,
impermeable fence surrounding it which won’t let anything else in.

User forum: The last user forum was18 March and there was no date set in the
minutes for the next meeting, nor has there been any information on the so-called
“Community Notice Board” as to when the next meeting is. The agenda for the last
meeting did not include the proposals for the campsite and the extension of the
riding stables. They were tabled at the meeting and our strong objections to both
were ignored, as were our emails to members and officers on the day of the
Executive Meeting reiterating our objections. The golf course users had no idea that
the golf course was being closed for good, as the LVRPA website continued to
promise its reopening right up to a week before the “announcement” of the campsite
plans. Indeed, the LVRPA are already taking bookings for the campsite, even
though the application for change of use will not be decided until 9 July. They have
been quoted in the Waltham Forest Guardian as saying that their plans are for a
temporary campsite, which is clearly untrue according to their own planning
application. The only comfort we have is that this plan will probably be a complete
failure as it is highly flawed. A better idea would be to re-open the golf course as a
nine hole organic golf course, with meadow areas to encourage wildlife and enhance
the appearance of the area, thus satisfying both the golfers and local walkers and
nature lovers, while giving the LVRPA a less costly source of income.

The lies told and empty promises made by the LVRPA ensure that the local users of
the area do not have a chance to object to the LVRPA’s raids on our green spaces.
The LVRPA presents the lack of objections as consent. But there is no consent to
the commercialism of our green spaces – there is, instead, a groundswell of local
public opinion that sees the LVRPA, not as the guardian of our land, but as an
increasingly greedy predator. If the LVRPA truly wants a dialogue with the users of
the land it is charged with protecting, however doubtful that seems to us, then it will
have to drastically change its ways.

Posted in Lea Marshes, Leyton Marsh, Leyton Marshes | Comments Off on A Litany of Broken Promises: Calling the LVRPA to Account

LVRPA face angry residents over their campsite and stables plans

At yesterday’s Lea Bridge Ward (WF) Community Forum five officers from the LVRPA struggled to answer the many questions and concerns of residents about the current planning applications re consolidating the fait-accompli loss of the golf course public amenity and the further reduction of unfettered open access to marsh land by changes at the riding stables.

Residents challenged Stephen Wilkinson that his organisation was intending to turn more and more of our local green space into money-making schemes to suit the regionally-strategic and financial aims of the LVRPA – now that they have the burden of three flagship sports/leisure venues to support post-Olympics. He waffled. Next he had no answer to the statements of residents that, whatever supposed financial gain might be made by the LVRPA in having a campsite and extra private horse accommodation/ activities in the Leyton part of the marshes, no benefit could be calculated as coming directly to the locality. He provided no evidence that local people would either take up camping or were horse-owners needing livery accommodation. Nor could he suggest any nearby public-access non-club golfing for local people. In any case he had to agree that the all-London + Essex/Herts precept funding is the fixed financial arrangement under the Act of Parliament and no ‘profits’ can trickle through otherwise. Cllr Afzal Akram tried to help him out of a tight spot by suggesting that campers would bring business into Leyton shops and pubs – well it raised a laugh anyway.

Crucially, Stephen Wilkinson could not supply evidence to repeated questions about the justification for a campsite – other than stating that it had proved popular during the Olympics. This fooled no-one, and he had to acknowledge that the Camping & Caravanning Club of GB will not re-licence the site for this year. There was no indication as to how this might affect standards offered to the unwitting future campers.

In answer to questions about pony-trekking, residents were told that horses will be led across Lea Bridge Road in the mornings and returned later in the day – not via the underpass, but using the traffic light crossing (which governs the two pavements, the two cycle lanes, one bus lane and the two-lane DOT trunk highway). More laughter. There was no indication of how the animals’ welfare will be maintained while they are away from the stables, and what may be needed re any sheltering or feeding space.

The surprisingly large contingent from LVRPA did however promise that the proposals will bring the added benefit of three more jobs to the area (not specified whether part-time or temporary etc). As they made a hasty exit with their giant publicity board after their agenda item, they were left in no doubt that, although there was one resident who supported the campsite and did not mind losing the golf course, their organisation was viewed as acting in an underhand way – by not re-opening the golf course as promised after the Olympics, and by trying to claim that the full and permanent changes of use of the land are only temporary.

Posted in Lea Marshes | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on LVRPA face angry residents over their campsite and stables plans