Open Letter to Shergroup

This letter refers to the defamatory and wholly misrepresentative article published about Leyton Marsh by Shergroup. This company maintained a somewhat menacing presence on the marsh (see image above) which involved watching and recording anyone walking on the marshes. This continued even after Shergroup had forcibly removed and manhandled members of the Community Support Camp (in at least one case causing injury to the person involved). Members of the Green Party who visited Leyton Marsh were appalled to witness Shergroup record them and refuse to engage in any dialogue or identify themselves. Unlike police officers, bailiffs working for the company are not required to identify themselves and do not have badge numbers or any other visual identification. As you can see from the image above, on certain occasions they wore hoods and covered their faces.

Any footage taken of Shergroup had a clear purpose; it was an indisputable testament to what really took place that day and was broadcast publicly and can be seen on youtube. No justification has been given regarding the footage taken of the public and individuals who have requested such footage of themselves were asked to pay a fee and then were refused permission to see the footage on the basis that other people were featured in the film.

This open letter has been written to Shergroup:

Dear Shergroup,
I would like to point out a number of areas in which this article http://www.shergroup.net/bulletin/april_2012/sher-rescue.aspx is inaccurate and out right misleading, in terms of both the description of events and categorisation of participants in an activity that resulted from community-led concerns.
Firstly the Save Leyton Marsh campaign was not an anti-Olympic campaign it was a resident-led movement to save Leyton Marsh from ‘development’; the area is protected habitat and is both widely utilised and treasured by the local community. The camp in question was not an Occupy camp but a Community Support Camp. It is true that some, not all, were affiliated with Occupy LSX, but some had distanced themselves from that particular movement as it did not represent their disposition. It therefore was not an Occupy camp.
Legal processes to ensure that health and safety guidelines were followed (in order to prevent people from being affected by hazardous materials unearthed by construction) were not met. At the time there was no reinstatement plan to return the Marsh to its former state and there were further concerns that the LVRPA intended to sell or redevelop the land after the Olympics. The cost of the Olympics was not part of the campaign message. The wisdom of spending millions of pounds of tax payers’ money on a temporary basketball facility was in question.
No-one participating on 10th April, the day of the eviction, endorsed or encouraged children to climb under the lorry except the person involved. Nor were animals used to create an obstruction. I respectfully request you to redact these statements as they are factually wrong. In the subsequent court hearing for the injunction, the judge did not uphold the ODA’s claims of intimidation and breaches of health and safety by protestors. This was despite the claimant  attempting to make this part of the case. The judgement was found in the claimant’s favour on the basis of property rights alone. I therefore respectfully ask you to retract the statement that your workforce and the police were put at risk. No arrests were made on such grounds. The arrests on that day were solely for failure to comply with an order of the police which resulted in four arrests.
I understand as a business it is important for you to sell the service you provide but regard it important to accurately portray past events as this has wider implications on the integrity of local residents and campaigners, citizens whom contribute to the financial dividends you receive from contracts.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours respectfully

Daniel Ashman

(A concerned human being who is watching the state in cohorts with the financial system rob the public dry of its common heritage)
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Help ensure the best possible reinstatement of Leyton Marsh

We have been working hard behind the scenes to ensure that Porter’s Field Meadow (Leyton Marsh) is not only protected in posterity but that the remedial works see the area reinstated to the very best condition possible.

We do not want short-term remedies that release the ODA from their legal obligations.

Our environmental team has researched and prepared documentation which the ODA has used as a basis for their reinstatement plan.

However, we are not convinced about all aspects of the Reinstatement Plan (20120711 v1), so again we are asking for your support.

Please write with any objections you may have to Terunesh.McKoy@walthamforest.gov.uk
A large number of submissions will make a difference when the planning committee are making their decisions.

Feel free to adapt and expand upon the following points prepared by Save Leyton Marsh group:

Leyton Marsh Temporary Basketball Training Venue (Ref: 2011/1560): Discharge of Conditions 1, 11, 13 and 14.

 

  • If the London Borough of Waltham Forest are to properly scrutinize the discharge of conditions relating to planning application 2011/1560 then the reinstatement plan should cover all aspects of the reinstatement. At present:
  1. The reinstatement plan does not cover discharge of Condition 14.
  2. The reinstatement plan does not acknowledge that the work cannot be completed by the repeatedly promised deadline of 15th October without working extended hours, yet the ODA say they have submitted an application to extend their working hours.
  3. Only Discharge of Condition 1 is being discussed at the planning committee meeting.

Given that much of the anger over the Games Time Training Venue (GTTV) on Leyton Marsh is about the way in which the full story was never presented and properly discussed when the initial planning decision was made, it is critical that LBWF insist that they are presented with a full and final statement and that the discharge of all conditions is discussed at the planning committee meeting.

 

LBWF should also censure the ODA for beginning work before the reinstatement plan has been approved. If work had to begin on the turf in June then the proposals for discharging all conditions should have been submitted to the council prior to this.

 

  • It is essential that the ODA and their contractors have a robust plan in place and that they are open and honest with LBWF and local people about how long it will take to execute this plan. This does not appear to be the case at the moment. There are inconsistencies in the timelines presented within the plans:
  1. The timeline for Option 3 in Appendix B bears no relationship to the information in section 5.3.10.
  2. The reinstatement plan states the land will be handed back on 15 October. Yet, in 21.11 of the method statement it says that the start date for the removal of the perimeter fence is 16 October and the task will take two days.
  3. The detailed plan in Appendix A of the method statement isn’t readable.

 

  • The documents consistently state that the topsoil is safe to reuse. However, it also states that one piece of asbestos was found. As I understand it eleven samples were taken from the topsoil and this one piece of asbestos was found within one of these eleven samples. The law of probability suggests that if one piece of asbestos was found in eleven small samples then the likelihood of the topsoil containing a lot more asbestos is very high. All the topsoil must be handpicked to ensure that there is no more asbestos.

 

  • It is not clear from the documents where liability lies if the reinstatement fails. Who is responsible for ensuring the sub-base is adequately laid and does not shift or sink? Who is responsible for the imported subsoil? Who is responsible for ensuring the turf does not fail? It is vital that long-term liabilities are established before the conditions are discharged and the ODA’s contractors begin work.

 

  • Why do the documents discuss digging up the Type 1 fill laid during the building of the GTTV and replacing it with Type 6F2 fill which is very similar? Why not limit the work and retain the Type 1 fill already in place?

 

  • The reinstatement plan ignores the logistics of managing stockpiles of incoming soil, waste arising and vehicle deliveries. It needs to be explained how this is to be managed without impacting either on areas already reinstated or encroaching on areas outside the licensed land causing further damage.

 

  • The documents mention a geotextile separator and state that this will help ‘should further excavation take place’. Leyton Marsh is Metropolitan Open Land. It is protected from development. No further excavation should ever take place and there is, consequently, no need for this geotextile separator to be laid. If it is retained, it will lead local people to conclude that the promise made by LBWF and the Lea Valley Regional Park Authority, that the building of the GTTV was a one-off event carried out under extraordinary circumstances, was false and the development is in fact part of a much larger plan to erode the protection afforded to Metropolitan Open Land. We therefore ask that the officer’s report and the planning committee to publicly reiterate LBWF’s commitment to ensuring the long-term sustainable future of Leyton Marsh as a green open space.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Help ensure the best possible reinstatement of Leyton Marsh

In the Name of the Future, Rio is Destroying its Past

In the Name of the Future, Rio is Destroying its Past

[Please share article http://bit.ly/OpEdProvidencia & accompanying video Providência: 115 Years of Struggle, widely, and tweet after 2pm EST today #remoçãonão #rio2016 as part of Tweetfest taking place as Rio’s governor and mayor return from London Games]

 

By THERESA WILLIAMSON and MAURÍCIO HORA

Published: August 12, 2012, Rio de Janeiro

 

THE London Olympics concluded Sunday, but the battle over the next games has just begun in Rio, where protests against illegal evictions of some of the city’s poorest residents are spreading. Indeed, the Rio Olympics are poised to increase inequality in a city already famous for it.

 

Last month, Unesco awarded World Heritage Site status to a substantial portion of the city, an area that includes some of its hillside favelas, where more than 1.4 million of the city’s 6 million residents live. No favela can claim greater historical importance than Rio’s first — Morro da Providência — yet Olympic construction projects are threatening its future.

 

Providência was formed in 1897 when veterans of the bloody Canudos war in Brazil’s northeast were promised land in Rio de Janeiro, which was then the federal capital. Upon arriving, they found no such land available. After squatting in front of the Ministry of War, the soldiers were moved to a nearby hill belonging to a colonel, though they were given no title to the land. Originally named “Morro da Favela” after the spiny favela plant typical of the Canudos hills where soldiers had spent many nights, Providência grew during the early 20th century as freed slaves joined the soldiers. New European migrants came as well, as it was the only affordable way to live near work in the city’s center and port.

 

Overlooking the site where hundreds of thousands of African slaves first entered Brazil, Providência is part of one of the most important cultural sites in Afro-Brazilian history, where the first commercial sambas were composed, traditions like capoeira and candomblé flourished and Rio’s Quilombo Pedra do Sal was founded. Today 60 percent of its residents are Afro-Brazilian.

 

Over a century after its creation, Providência still bears the cultural and physical imprint of its initial residents. But now it is threatened with destruction in the name of Olympic improvements: almost a third of the community is to be razed, a move that will inevitably destabilize what’s left of it.

 

By mid-2013 Providência will have received 131 million reais ($65 million) in investments under a private-sector-led plan to redevelop Rio’s port area, including a cable car, funicular tram and wider roads. Previous municipal interventions to upgrade the community recognized its historical importance, but today’s projects have no such intent.

 

Although the city claims that investments will benefit residents, 30 percent of the community’s population has already been marked for removal and the only “public meetings” held were to warn residents of their fate. Homes are spray-painted during the day with the initials for the municipal housing secretary and an identifying number. Residents return from work to learn that their homes

will be demolished, with no warning of what’s to come, or when.

 

A quick walk through the community reveals the appalling state of uncertainty residents are living in: at the very top of the hill, some 70 percent of homes are marked for eviction — an area supposedly set to benefit from the transportation investments being made. But the luxury cable car will transport 1,000 to 3,000 people per hour during the Olympics. It’s not residents who will benefit, but investors.

 

Residents of Providência are fearful. Only 36 percent of them hold documentation of their land rights, compared with 70 percent to 95 percent in other favelas. More than in other poor neighborhoods, residents are particularly unaware of their rights and terrified of losing their homes. Combine this with the city’s “divide and conquer” approach — in which residents are confronted individually to sign up for relocation, and no community-wide negotiations are permitted — and resistance is effectively squelched.

 

Pressure from human rights groups and the international news media has helped. But brutal evictions continue as well as new, subtler forms of removal. As part of the city’s port revitalization plan, authorities declared the “relocations” to be in the interest of residents because they live in “risky areas” where landslides might occur and because “de-densification” is required to improve quality of life.

 

But there is little evidence of landslide risk or dangerous overcrowding; 98 percent of Providência’s homes are made of sturdy brick and concrete and 90 percent have more than three rooms. Moreover, an important report by local engineers showed that the risk factors announced by the city were inadequately studied and inaccurate.

 

If Rio succeeds in disfiguring and dismantling its most historic favela, the path will be open to further destruction throughout the city’s hundreds of others. The economic, social and psychological impacts of evictions are dire: families moved into isolated units where they lose access to the enormous economic and social benefits of community cooperation, proximity to work and existing social networks — not to mention generations’ worth of investments made in their homes.

 

Rio is becoming a playground for the rich, and inequality breeds instability. It would be much more cost-effective to invest in urban improvements that communities help shape through a participatory democratic process. This would ultimately strengthen Rio’s economy and improve its infrastructure while also reducing inequality and empowering the city’s still marginalized Afro-Brazilian population.

 

Theresa Williamson, the publisher of RioOnWatch, founded Catalytic Communities, an advocacy group for favelas. Maurício Hora, a photographer, runs the Favelarte program in the Providência favela.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on In the Name of the Future, Rio is Destroying its Past

video – poverty torch relay 27 July 2012

film by Genie Weaver

[vimeo http://www.vimeo.com/47101884 w=400&h=300]

Also there is a great film by DailyMotion here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on video – poverty torch relay 27 July 2012

Olympic projection spotlights Adidas factories ‘exploitation’

Inspirational action from War on Want.

From war on want here

Olympic projection spotlights Adidas factories ‘exploitation’

05 August 2012

NEWS PEG: Sunday, 5 August 2012   Olympic men’s 100 metres final

Olympic projection spotlights Adidas factories ‘exploitation’

London 2012 sponsor attacked over workers’ sweatshop conditions

Campaigners tonight projected a huge image on a building overlooking the Olympic Park, accusing the Olympics sportswear partner Adidas of making millions out of the exploitation of workers who make its clothes.

Adidas exploitation projection

Adidas has already sold £100 million of Olympic clothing whilst workers making its goods around the world are paid poverty wages and are having to skip meals to survive.

The anti-poverty charity War on Want beamed the 65 feet high image – which proclaimed “exploitation – not OK here, not OK anywhere” underneath Adidas famous three striped logo – as the sell-out 80,000 crowd left the stadium after the Olympic highlight, the men’s 100 metres final.

Video

Murray Worthy, War on Want’s sweatshops campaigner, said: “Adidas are making millions yet the workers who make their clothes have to skip meals just to get by. This is exploitation. It wouldn’t be ok for Adidas to do this in the UK and it shouldn’t be ok anywhere else. Adidas must ensure that workers are paid enough to live.”

With the world’s eyes on London, the protest follows reports that Adidas factory workers near the Cambodian capital Phnom Penh receive £10 a week basic pay, are forced to work overtime, cannot afford decent food and live in squalid conditions.

War on Want also cites other Adidas workers struggling to survive on well under a living wage in the Philippines, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and China.

It contrasts the workers’ poverty pay with the £529 million profits Adidas recorded in 2011 and its chief executive Herbert Hainer’s £4.6 million “compensation” last year.

NOTES TO EDITORS

  1. For images and video contact Paul Collins, War on Want Media Officer (+44) (0)7983 550728 | pcollins@waronwant.org
  2. More information about the campaign is available at www.notOKanywhere.org
  3. Allegations that Cambodians earn just a £10 a week basic wage for making Adidas products came last month at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/news/9399363/Cambodian-workers-on-10-a-week-making-Olympics-fanwear.html
  4. In May, research by the Playfair 2012 coalition, including War on Want, found workers producing Adidas goods for poverty wages and forced to work excessive overtime. According to the study, people in China worked from 8 am to 11 pm. In Sri Lanka researchers discovered people compelled to work overtime in order to meet production targets. In the Philippines, more than half the workers interviewed said that in order to cover their essential needs they are forced to pawn their bank cash dispenser cards to loan sharks for high-interest loans. At all of the factories researchers visited, workers reported that they were not paid a living wage to meet their basic needs. Report at http://www.tuc.org.uk/tucfiles/291/sportswear.pdf
  5. In April the Independent reported Indonesian workers making Adidas gear, to be worn by Team GB athletes and Games volunteers, toiled up to 65 hours a week for poverty pay and suffered physical and verbal abuse. Story at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/exposed-the-reality-behind-londons-ethical-olympics-7644013.html
  6. Adidas have refuted the 34p an hour claim, yet it has provided no evidence that the workers received higher wages. The Adidas’ official response also confirmed that at least one of its Indonesian suppliers failed to pay the legally mandated minimum wage.
  7. War on Want has also criticised Adidas for asserting in a statement that they had twice offered to talk with the charity, but received no response. It stressed that discussions with Adidas have taken place, but the multinational continues to deny the widespread nature of the problems and has failed to respond to the organisation’s demands that the firm commits to paying a living wage.

CONTACT: Paul Collins, War on Want media officer (+44) (0)7983 550728

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Olympic projection spotlights Adidas factories ‘exploitation’

Defence campaign for the Critical Mass 182

From Counter Olympics  Network

A meeting to help establish a defence campaign for the Critical Mass 182 – Thursday 9 August

Most people will know about Critical Mass bike rides, and about what happened in London last month. If you don’t know: read the next two paragraphs. If you do: skip this next section!

[Critical Mass is an international phenomenon. In London, these rides have been taking place every single month for 18 years; cyclists meet at the same time (6-6.30pm) and place (on the South Bank, under the south end of Waterloo Bridge) on the last Friday of the month. CM is hard to define: the rides aren’t really a protest, perhaps they’re more a celebration of cycling, and an assertion of the right of cyclists to move freely and safely around London. There’s no structure; no-one is in control; routes and destinations aren’t planned in advance; anyone turning up on a bike is an equal part of CM. Rides are generally peaceful and self-regulating. The police have mostly ignored the rides in recent times.

But on the last ride, on 27 July – which attracted a typical summer crowd of many hundreds of the usual cross-section of cyclists – large numbers of police turned up in a spirit of Olympic hysteria. Some of the police busied themselves giving pieces of paper to some (but far from all) of the cyclists present. The paper purported to ban the cyclists from going anywhere north of the river. Most of the cyclists eventually did cross the river, however, and many hundreds of them went via Stratford on their travels. A lot of cyclists from one of the batches that went to Stratford were rounded up by police there (as were some cyclists who happened to be in the area and had nothing whatsoever to do with Critical Mass). Including a handful of arrests of cyclists elsewhere, a grand total of 182 cyclists ended up in custody that night. There are some reports at the (unofficial) CM site. Now read on…]

Supporting the CM 182

At a meeting of Counter Olympics Network organisers on Wednesday, the 182 CM arrests were naturally a cause of concern. It was noted that, amongst the many issues underlying CON, there has always been awareness that police might use the excuse or the context of the Olympics to try some heavy-handed policing. What happened to Critical Mass seemed a prime example of this fear being realised.

There was also concern that precisely because Critical Mass has no organisation or structure, it would be hard for those involved to come together to establish a defence campaign. So it was agreed to give over most of what would have been the next CON organising meeting to trying to help the setting up of any defence campaign those involved might want.

The meeting is on Thursday 9 August at 7pm
at Firebox, 106-108 Cromer Street, London WC1 (this is a couple of blocks behind Camden Town Hall on Euston Road, just a few minutes from Kings Cross and St Pancras stations).

It was stressed that CON itself is in no position to organise this defence campaign, and nor would it be appropriate for CON to do so. CON is attempting, in a comradely fashion, to do what it can to facilitate the establishment of such a campaign by those involved – by offering this time and space.

So:
…if you’re sometimes a CM cyclist
…if you were arrested on 27 July
…if you’re involved in a police monitoring group or a right to protest campaign
…if you’re giving legal support to any of those arrested
you’re warmly invited to this meeting.

What comes out of the meeting is up to those attending; at the very least it might establish or improve communications amongst some of those involved.

Anyone interested who can’t get to the meeting is welcome to send a message via the Contact page of this website, including their contact details within the message, and the message can be printed out and taken to the meeting.

Please share news of this meeting as widely as possible.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Defence campaign for the Critical Mass 182

Some reports from the anti-Olympic torch relay

On Friday 27th July, the Vancouver Poverty torch was carried around Hackney in an anti-Olympic torch relay. Save Leyton marsh took part in the relay and welcomed the torch and runners to Leyton Marsh with food and festivities.

Reports from the relay can be found here:

lives; running: Running the second counter-Olympic relay

Counter Olympics Network: Counter Olympics Torch Relay – Second Leg – A Beautiful Day!

Some photos on demotix here.

A film from dailymotion here

A film from Genie Weaver here

Another film from caffeinebomb here

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Some reports from the anti-Olympic torch relay

Solidarity with Critical Mass arrestees

While millions watched the London2012 opening ceremony last Friday night, just outside, 182 cyclists were kettled, detained and arrested for the heinous crime of cycling. CS gas was also used by transport police against cyclists.

Strict anti-protest bail conditions have been issued to the arrestees on release.

Save Leyton Marsh would like to express solidarity with all those arrested, detained and assaulted on Critical Mass and ask that people sign the following petition.

—————-
Justice for the Critical Mass 182 

On Friday 27th July, 182 cyclists were held in a police kettle for two hours, handcuffed in buses for three hours, and held in a police cell from six hours to two days. These included a 13 year old boy. Police also confirmed the cyclists reports that CS gas was used during these arrests. Out of 182 cyclists, only 3 have been charged with any offence. However, ALL have bail conditions imposed on them until September 18th 2012 restricting their freedom to move, assemble, associate and live their lives.

We have the following demands:
1. All bail conditions should be discharged
2. All data including DNA, fingerprint, addresses etc taken from those cyclists should be removed from all paper and comupter records of police & other agencies.
3. An independent review of the police behaviour on Friday 27th July should be conducted as a matter of urgency.

All this for continuing the 18 year tradition of a bike ride through the streets of London on the last Friday of every month. 

This political policing to crush dissent and restrict peoples rights without charge must be stoppped. Help us stand for a police and legal system which we can believe in, sign our petition today.

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/metropolitan-police-criminal-justice-system-uk-justice-for-the-critical-mass-182?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Solidarity with Critical Mass arrestees

Counter Olympics Torch Relay – 2nd Leg – Hackney: Clissold Park to Leyton Marsh

repost from counter olympics network

We are proud to announce the second leg of the historic Counter Olympics Protest Torch Relay which will be run on Friday 27th July. The iconic Vancouver Poverty Olympics Torch will make its journey around the streets of Hackney starting from the cafe in Clissold Park, Stoke Newington Church Street and ending at Leyton Marsh, the scene of recent ODA depredations. The relay is dedicated to those who were imprisoned and who received ASBOs, fines or restrictions on their movements in response to their peaceful attempts to prevent the ODA and Waltham Forest Council breaking planning law.

The relay will start at 2pm from the cafe in Clissold Park and will take approximately one hour to complete its journey to Leyton Marsh where it will be welcomed by Save Leyton Marsh campaigners. Anyone planning to participate should aim to arrive at the cafe at 1.30pm. If you are travelling by public transport the best bus to get to Clissold Park is the 393 which goes past Highbury and Islington Station The route for the relay will run along Stoke Newington Church Street, Stoke Newington High St and Road, Kingsland High Street, Dalston Lane, Amhurst Road, Mare Street, Richmond Road, London Fields, Broadway Market, Tow Path to Victoria Park, Lauriston Road, Well Street, Morning Lane, Ponsford Street, Homerton High Street, Brooksby’s Way, Chatsworth Road, Lea Bridge Road, Middlesex Wharf to Leyton Marsh.

Come and cheer the runners as they pass your street!

See

map1 beginning and end

and map2 middle section

.
Please note there may be changes to the route on the day.

from: http://counterolympicsnetwork.wordpress.com/2012/07/25/counter-olympics-torch-relay-2nd-leg-hackney-clissold-park-to-leyton-marsh/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Counter Olympics Torch Relay – 2nd Leg – Hackney: Clissold Park to Leyton Marsh

Please read through and comment on the reinstatement plans for Leyton Marsh which are now on the Environmental page…

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on