LEYTON MARSH UNDER THREAT AGAIN!

We are asking everyone to urgently read and distribute the following information outlining a very real renewed threat to our marsh:

Official Letter from LVRPA confirms development agenda

A letter from Shaun Dawson sent from Chief Executive of the LVRPA to Cllr. Ian Rathbone a few days ago outlines how the authority intends to spend the £65,000 arising from the loan of Leyton Marsh to the Olympic Delivery Authority. It is clear that as well as popular suggestions made at user forums, such as natural screening of the present ice centre, proposals from the authority which received no support, such as altering the car park access and clearing wildlife areas will also be adopted. However, there are even more worrying statements about LVRPA’s agenda for Lea Marshes.

Right at the end of the communication, the Chief Executive Shaun Dawson answers Ian’s query about possible development of a new ice centre. Ever since the ill conceived basketball training court was constructed, Save Leyton Marsh group have been pressing for a long-term commitment from the authority that the land would be properly restored and never built on again.

Unfortunately, despite all the community campaigning that has taken place this year, the letter confirms that Leyton Marsh is being considered as a possible site for a brand new larger ice centre.

Laying topsoil

Geo-textile membrane being laid on Leyton Marsh

The letter states that the LVRPA are “looking at a range of sites” in the Lee Valley for this new ice centre including the “existing site on Lea Bridge Road.” As the proposal is for a larger ice centre, if the present site is chosen, this will include construction on presently green land. Even more disturbing is the fact that the original concrete foundations for the basketball court were left under the ground so they could support a future structure. The addition of recycled construction waste in the reinstatement plan was queried since this is usually placed underneath surfaces requiring heavy loads, such as roads and multi-storey buildings. Locals were baffled as to why the authorities who were publicly committed and under obligation to restore the marsh to “its original condition” placed a geo-textile membrane 12cm down in the reinstated ground, especially as this has since caused the marsh to become flooded with standing water which is now rotting the turf . However the membrane was explicitly included in the reinstatement plan to assist “possible future excavation” which appears an increasingly likely possibility.

The basketball court development only received planning permission on the basis that the facility was “temporary”, that the Olympics were “special circumstances” and that the marsh would be “restored to its original condition” Now the marsh has been damaged, there are no special circumstances of “national interest” such as the Olympics and the development of an ice centre would be permanent. However, as we warned, the planning permission given for the basketball courts changed the nature of the land from ‘playing fields’ to ‘suitable for purposes of assembly and leisure’, thus making future development easier.

What You Can Do
It is imperative we act quickly to let the authority know they should eliminate the Metropolitan Open Land of Porter’s Field Meadow (Leyton Marsh) from consideration in any future development plans. Over two thousand people have already signed petitions demanding that the LVRPA fulfil their obligation as guardians of the land and protect Leyton Marsh from development.

Please come along to our meeting at 7.30pm on Monday 14th January at Princess of Wales pub to discuss ways we can protect Leyton Marsh from any future construction.

For those of you who can’t make the meeting, there are many ways you can help. We need people to tweet @LeeValleyPark reminding them that the community is completely against any development; to share this news and your views on Twitter and Facebook ; to write to the LVRPA and Waltham Forest Council/ Hackney Council and ask for assurances they will not allow development of this treasured green space and most importantly inform everyone you know about what is happening!

Whilst the authority have claimed any attempt to develop Leyton Marsh would involve “community engagement” (not consultation), the community have made their views of united opposition clear and will continue to do so until the future of the marsh as an open uncommercialised space is guaranteed.

We have an anniversary fundraising quiz on Friday 18th January at the Hare & Hounds pub. Please come along and invite your friends – funds will be needed for a new campaign to save our marsh!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on LEYTON MARSH UNDER THREAT AGAIN!

An Aural History of Our Campaign

Three recordings of the Save Leyton Marsh campaign are now available from RadioPete’s website where you can trace the campaign’s beginnings from our very first meeting. Many unfortunately prophetic statements are made by members of the campaign about the Leyton Marsh construction and its effects back in January 2012. Check the recordings out!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on An Aural History of Our Campaign

There’s Been Very Little Basketball But a Lot of Passing the Buck!

As suspected, there has been some elaborate buck passing between the LVRPA, Waltham Forest Council and the ODA about the incredibly poor state of restoration of Porter’s Field Meadow (Leyton Marsh) and the adjacent Sandy Lane.

IMG_8365(1)After residents and SLM campaigners wrote to local Walthamstow MP Stella Creasy, she got in touch with them about the poor state of the waterlogged marsh where the monoculture turf is now rotting in places. Waltham Forest wrote back with this poor response which completely ignored the fact planning permission was granted (and the reinstatement plan approved) by that Council on the basis that the marsh was restored to its original condition on 15th October 2012. Stella emails 3

Despite the lip service paid to upholding the planning conditions, which they were responsible for overseeing, Waltham Forest Council now conveniently state that all “management and maintenance of the site” is a matter for the LVRPA.

The LVRPA, meanwhile, overseen by the appropriately named Dan Buck, claim that “the marshes are visited on a daily basis by the South Ranger Team who inspect and report back the snagging issues that remain to be resolved by the ODA including the works to Sandy Lane. The clear message that has been reported back to the ODA by Dan Buck is that Sandy Lane is still in a very poor condition and recent repairs are in no way acceptable. We will be continuing to press the issue and monitor the ongoing works until they are completed to a standard we are happy with.” To cut a long story short, the LVRPA blame the ODA for the poor works and imply that the responsibility lies with them.

IMG_1874So how do the Olympic Delivery Authority respond to complaints about the poor restoration? As seen in the previous email to local resident ‘Fabsternation’, the ODA claim “We have completed the reinstatement works in accordance with the specifications agreed with Lee Valley Regional Park Authority (LVRPA) and Waltham Forest Council. Land on Porter’s Field used for the temporary basketball venue has now been handed back to LVRPA and an ongoing programme of maintenance, funded by the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is being agreed.” Along with Waltham Forest Council, the ODA are all to happy to pass the buck back to the LVRPA who they claim are “now responsible for the land and future enquiries should be addressed to them”

Which leaves the obvious question: who is responsible for actually addressing the multiple issues created by a wholly inappropriate construction and reckless and inappropriate reinstatement? It seems yet again, it is down to the community to try and save our marsh long-term whilst the authorities responsible play the blame game for far longer than anyone played basketball on Leyton Marsh.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Fabsternation expresses consternation at state of Leyton Marsh

marsh floodedLocal Walthamstow MP Stella Creasy wrote to Gerry Murphy of the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) explaining the inadequate restoration of Leyton Marsh, which the ODA and LVRPA promised would be returned to its ‘original condition’ by 15th October 2012.

This is the response she received:

Dear Stella,
Apologies for the delay in responding.
We have completed the reinstatement works in accordance with the specifications agreed with Lee Valley Regional Park Authority (LVRPA) and Waltham Forest Council. Land on Porter’s Field used for the temporary basketball venue has now been handed back to LVRPA and an ongoing programme of maintenance, funded by the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is being agreed. The ODA has provided more than £65,000 to LVRPA as part a license agreement to be spent on improvements on Leyton Marsh, including increased seating, new paths and gates, and enhanced wildlife habitats. LVRPA is now responsible for the land and future enquiries should be addressed to them, although we remain happy to answer any further queries you may have regarding the reinstatement.
Best wishes,
Gerry Murphy
Director of Finance Olympic Delivery Authority

 

A local resident Waltham Forest resident, known on Twitter as @Fabsternation wrote this eloquent response:

Dear Mr Murphy

Thank you for your considered response.Yes, myself and others who use the marsh everyday are aware that the reinstatement works have been completed. The issue here is about the standard of work carried out by your contractors to reinstate the marsh back to its previous condition before handing it back to the LVRPA.

As you will have seen from the photos of Porter’s Field, it has been, and continues to be, partially flooded in vast areas. It is also bald and patchy in other sections. A walk around the area shows clear signs of poor & inconsistent workmanship. In a few areas, the turf has been laid ‘around’ existing structures before they were fully removed off site, leaving behind clear demarcations of ‘before’ & ‘after’ of where things had stood. It would be almost comical were it not for the fact it is rather botched.

It is worth pointing out that the field never used to flood for as long as living memory that myself and others have used the marsh to walk our dogs or use the space. Now it is both permanently squishy underfoot (to sections which are not flooded), while managing to be water-logged in various parts which are not unusable. It is evident that failure to consider proper grit for drainage under the top soil is part of the problem. You will no doubt realise too that the diversity of the turf is another reason why the field is constantly water-logged. Where there was biodiversity in the soil texture before, it has been replaced with what is visibly domestic monocultural turf.

I’d also like to point out that the large lining sheet which has controversially remained under the soil post-construction was supposed to be permeable. Perhaps it is not as permeable as we have been led to believe? The ongoing flooding does not subside even when the rain has stopped for a considerable period. There needs to be an investigation into this problem. As with all things causal & effectual, the problem has only arisen since the completion of the reinstatement of the marsh.

With respect, Leyton Marsh unfortunately has not been reinstated according to the LB Waltham Forest planning conditions. Our Walthamstow High Street Ward Councillor Clare Coghill, who is on copy here, will most certainly back us up on this when we say laying the responsibility of this problem now on to LBWF is wholly unacceptable. As we’ve witnessed from the triumphant Olympic summer, the ODA is capable of great things. In this instance however, I urge you to look at the photos post-reinstatement and tell us you are satisfied with the level of work carried out.

Perhaps a visit to the site is warranted in order to truly assess the condition of Porter’s Field and take steps to:
– investigate the reasons behind the permanency of the waterlogged areas
– make good the sections of turf where clear lines of demarcation are visible
  Because your contractors turfed around obstructions before these were removed, the work carried out is therefore technically incomplete
– look into how wild flowering seeds can be scattered to encourage & speed up a return of the biodiversity of the turf
– investigate whether the permeable lining left underground is in fact one of the causes of the flooding
– consider how grit can be reintroduced so the turf is not squishy and sinks underfoot

Lastly, you mention the introduction of the new benches as part of the programme of investment. Yes, myself and other Friends of the Marsh have noticed these new benches. Nice as they are to look at, there is one small but crucial problem with them: they are far too low for the elderly or those with mobility issues to actually use.

The old benches before were between 500mm to 600mm high and were of a more suitable & ergonomic height. Importantly, some also had back support which meant there was a ‘grab’ feature for stability when lowering or rising from the sitting position. These new ‘minimalist’ benches however are approximately 400mm in height and cause major difficulties for the elderly dog walkers I know who have been going to the marshes for over 60 years(!)

It seems the new benches have not turned out to be an improvement as they do not provide access for a wider range of people and fail to consider the most favourable corporal sitting position. It has to be asked: were residents and Marsh users consulted at the design stage before these minimalist benches were installed? A 200mm height difference, back support & grab feature considerations might not mean a lot to able-bodied public space users, but to the elderly, disabled and those with mobility issues, it literally falls short.

I attach photos of the old benches so you may compare with the new ones, and trust this too will be taken on board, with a view to increase the bench height so that a wider range of people may benefit and continue to use the marsh as before.

I look forward to a positive response with a strategy in place to rectify the points highlighted above.

Many thanks Gerry.

@Fabsternation
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Fabsternation expresses consternation at state of Leyton Marsh

The Price Paid for Opposing Destruction of Leyton Marsh

Save Leyton Marsh protestor threatened with £335,000 eviction costs – video

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Treasures of the Turf

The most uninteresting looking expanses of amenity grass hide an incredible variety of plants, waiting for the rare opportunities to burst out with colour and texture.

Routinely mown to within an inch of its life by the LVRPA and Waltham Forest Council’s contractors, the occasional hiccup in mowing regime allows a glimpse of how things could be.

In summer 2011 a brief respite in mowing allowed an expanse of yarrow, mallow and wild barley to flourish in front of the Lee Valley Ice Centre to the delight of the insects. This was soon corrected and such a lapse has not been repeated.

Red-tailed bumblebee on ragwort. Like many of the most important plants for biodiversity, though common, its opportunity to flourish is very restricted due to its ‘weed’ status and vulnerabilty to mowing, strimming and other suppression measures – particularly as it is often found beside paths.

DEFRA’s information sheet on ragwort says:

It is the food of at least 77 species of insect herbivore: 27 species of moth, 22 species of thrip, 13 species of bug, nine species of flies and six species of beetle. The most famous is the cinnabar moth whose yellow and black banded larva can defoliate entire plants. The number of species feeding on ragwort nectar is not known but is several hundreds of species. (177 species of insects have actually been recorded using common ragwort as a source of nectar or pollen).

Pollen provided by common ragwort, in its season, aids the pollination of other plants, both wild and domestic, over a foraging range of at least a 1km radius by bumblebees Bombus spp., solitary bees Lasioglossum spp., drone-flies Eristalis tenax and the carrion flies. The use of common ragwort by carrion-associated species demonstrates the role in supporting the decomposition cycle in the local area.

The number of predators and parasites dependent on the invertebrate resource supported by common ragwort stands is incalculable.

The invertebrates referred to in above include five red data book and eight nationally scarce species. Common ragwort has been observed as host to the Common Broomrape and 14 species of fungi.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

BEYOND RECEIVED WISDOM A VISIT TO CHARLIE SEBER’S COMFREY FIELD IN LEYTON MARSHES

WHEN: Sunday 2nd December 2012, from 1 – 3pm
WHERE: Car park outside the Lee Valley Riding Centre, 71 Lea Bridge Rd., London, E10 7QL
RSVP: Places are limited, so please book in advance: mail@household- knowledge.net

38 years ago Newham resident Charlie Seber adopted an overlooked piece of land in the Lee Valley. Ever since, he has used it to cultivate masses of comfrey. Charlie will give us a guided tour of his field, talk about comfrey’ s unique qualities and his many different experiments with the plant.

The walk will set off from the Lee Valley Riding Centre car park, where a workshop will be set up within Wick On Wheels – our mobile project space made from a specially re-purposed milk float. The workshop will feature various experiments from Charlie’s home laboratory, ranging from plant regulated growing systems using recycled bath tubs to a cure for blight using garlic pulp.

This event is part of our Experiments in Household Knowledge – a series of collaborations with East London ecological and environmental innovators. The project will explore and showcase unusual and inventive ways of making and experimenting. From new gardening techniques to alternative forms of energy production or innovative recycling methods, we’ll be sharing a range of unique and often self-taught skills through walks, talks and hands-on workshops.

Experiments in Household Knowledge is a public works project commissioned by the London Legacy Development Corporation anticipating the opening of the new North Park Hub building in Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park in the summer of 2013. The project is also part of R-Urban, a two year long project establishing practices and networks of urban resilience supported by the EU Life+ programme on environmental governance.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on BEYOND RECEIVED WISDOM A VISIT TO CHARLIE SEBER’S COMFREY FIELD IN LEYTON MARSHES

Development Proposals For Our Marshes

The National Grid have plans to dig up Walthamstow Marshes for power lines connecting Eade Road Shafthouse with Hackney Powerstation on Millfields, an image of the proposed route is displayed.
The document explaining the proposed works states:

National Grid
Ground Investigation Works at Leyton and Walthamstow Marshes

National Grid owns and manages the grids to which many different energy sources are
connected.  In Britain it runs the systems that deliver gas and electricity across the entire
county, which means it holds a vital position at the centre of the energy system – National
Grid joins everything up.

In London electricity consumption is rising each year and it is National Grid’s responsibility to ensure there is sufficient transmission infrastructure available to support the Capital’s future energy demand.

In February 2011, as part if it’s continued investment, National Grid embarked upon a seven- year project to rewire the capital via deep underground tunnels, in order to meet increasing electricity demand and help London access the renewable energy of the future.

In total 32km of tunnels are being constructed between 20m and 60m deep below the road
network. The tunnels will carry high voltage (400kV) electricity cables and connect existing substations at the following locations:

• Hackney
• St John’s Wood
• Willesden
• Wimbledon

By housing the cables in deep underground tunnels we will significantly reduce disruption to the local area as we are able to lay the cables and carry out maintenance work without digging up the road network.

Intermediate tunnel access shafts are required along the tunnel route.  The two tunnel boring machines which are being used to dig the tunnel will connect these points as they progress along the route.  Headhouse buildings will then be constructed above the tunnel shafts. These are needed to ensure the safety of our workforce during construction, provide access to the tunnel for maintenance work, and store ventilation equipment which is required to cool the electricity cables and regulate the temperature inside the tunnel.

As a complex engineering project, it is vital that we have a detailed understanding of the
ground conditions we will be tunnelling through, and therefore a series of boreholes are
being completed along the tunnel route to ensure we have accurate and reliable ground
condition information.

The borehole investigations planned within Leyton and Walthamstow Marshes form part of this work and will take approximately 26 days to complete.  The borehole will be approximately 30cm wide and 50m deep, and the small surrounding area required to complete the work will be temporarily secured using metal fencing.  Once the work has been completed National Grid will place a small cover on the surface and will visit occasionally. There will be no remaining above ground presence on the land.

For further information about the London Power Tunnels project please visit
www.londonpowertunnels.co.uk
Email: nationalgrid@londonpowertunnels.co.uk
Freephone: 0800 783 2855

Lee Navigation by Walthamstow Marshes 

The River Restoration Centre  

Ref: TQ3481387570 to TQ3534787061.

Status:  Proposed.

Description: Create a new ditch and wetland features including ponds and reedbeds with broadwalks and interpretation.    Sheet piled banks adjacent to Walthamstow Marshes SSSI, poor quality land adjacent to the river.

Main funding:       Heritage Lottery Funding

Reach length:   700m

Main motivations:     Development gain_x000B_Community demand_x000B_Habitat

Non-funding partners:       Community Groups

Other funding organisations:  EU LIFE+ funding, Natural England, Waltham Forest, Environment Agency

Lea Valley Regional Park Authority

Business Plan 2013-2015

Section 1) Background: “By 2020 the Lee Valley will be a world class leisure destination”
“Underlying the Authority’s approach across all business areas is the philosophy of being ‘community focused and commercially driven’. The organisation must endeavour to deliver accessible and high quality activities and destinations for its regional constituents whilst at the same time maximising the commercial potential of ALL of its assets”
Section 6) Major Development projects
“Over the next few years there are 2 sites which will be taken forward for development projects: Picketts Lock and the Lea Bridge Road area.
A feasibility study for the new Ice Centre in the park will commence in the next two months. The outcome of this study will help inform the options for Picketts Lock. Officers are also assessing options for taking forward the Waterworks following a successful spell as a campsite during the Games. The potential for the site being developed for visitor short-term and long-term accommodation is being seriously considered”
Section 8) Organisational Development
seeking the “most effective structure to maximise income generation”
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Development Proposals For Our Marshes

Assembly Member Jenny Jones Visits Leyton Marsh

[slideshow] Today Assembly member Jenny Jones visited Leyton Marsh to witness first hand the problems with the reinstatement of the area of marsh used for the construction of the Olympic basketball practice venue.

Campaigners from the Save Leyton Marsh group joined Jenny for a walk around the marsh, pointing out the contrast between the original undamaged land and the area that should have been reinstated to its original condition and instead is carpeted in monoculture turf. The turf clearly has not taken and can be manually picked up by hand. In many places it is extremely waterlogged, in stark contrast to the undeveloped areas of the land, which could lead to the turf rotting if no remedial action is taken to get rid of the standing water. This problem of standing water, clearly visible in the images, arises from the addition of a plastic membrane only 12cm from the surface which is clearly preventing drainage. Jenny was clearly shocked at the botched nature of the reinstatement efforts carried out by Nussli and STRI on the basis of an ODA plan approved by Waltham Forest Council and the LVRPA.

Save Leyton Marsh has pointed out all along that it would be impossible to restore the marsh to its ‘original condition’, which was not just a claim made by the ODA but was also a condition of Waltham Forest granting permission and Hackney Council putting in no objection to the plans for the basketball court. After being treated with absolute contempt at Waltham Forest Council, where our concerns regarding the reinstatement were blithely dismissed as ‘details’ for the officers to deal with, we have seen no evidence of the council officers taking an active role in assuring adequate reinstatement. They have not visited the marsh since the site visits by the ODA, which ended before the land was returned to public use.

Jenny will be writing to the authorities concerned to clarify why a monoculture turf, composed almost entirely of rye grass, exists on a site previously home to many wildflowers and funghi species. She will be supporting our demand that an Environmental Impact Assessment is carried out on the land in order to ascertain the extent of the damage and in order to design proper remediation. This remediation should include perforating the membrane, or even its removal altogether, as well as a sowing of the appropriate seeds to make our marsh beautiful again. Our group will also be supported by Jenny in our demand that the LVRPA put aside the funds to restore the marsh adequately and do not consider the marsh as a future site for a new larger Ice Centre. A feasibility study for such a facility is to be carried out for the ‘Lea Bridge Road’ area in the next two months.

Save Leyton Marsh demands

  • To get clarification about what wilflower seeds were used in what quantities on the turf and what the plans are if the seeds don’t germinate.
  • That the membrane is removed altogether, to allow drainage, and to undermine any future suggestion of building on the land again.
  • That the LVRPA and WF Council commit to restoring the marsh to its original condition including the infill, the turf, the planting of appropriate seeds as promised, committing the necessary funds (if necessary over and above the £65k agreed in the planning conditions and the £3k of ‘fines’ imposed on the ODA for not reinstating the land by the due date of 15th October).
  • That an independent assessment is carried out on Leyton Marsh now reinstatement has taken place to assess the environmental impact of the development.
  • That Leyton Marsh is categorically ruled out as being part of the feasibility study into the re-development of the Ice Centre as part of the LVRPA 2013-15 Business Plan.
  • A SIGNED WRITTEN GUARANTEE BY THE CHAIRMAN OF LVRPA THAT THEY WILL NEVER BUILD ON THE LAND AGAIN, HOWEVER TEMPORARILY.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Does this look like a ‘pristine condition’ Leyton Marsh to you?

[slideshow]

More galleries | Comments Off on Does this look like a ‘pristine condition’ Leyton Marsh to you?